關於百無一用是書生罷免的決戰，還剩下不夠兩小時，未投票的，趕快在世界協調時今日五點，即香港時間凌晨一點前投票。
小弟先不論在戰略上的意義，事實上，戰爭的勝負早就清楚，小弟先提出兩點「戰場觀察」。
連瀑布汗這位行政員都投票到反對罷免議案一方時，小弟可以說，八位行政員宣布無中立可言。換言之，這次書生黨有何底牌，有什麼力量要出，基本上都浮出來。
http://twitter.com/huohua/status/12643309111
當有人用傻逼來辱罵支持罷免的人時，這眾中國來的用戶和管理員，己經沒有尊重對方的心，甚至可以這樣說，去到這樣關頭，什麼風度、禮貌早忘得七七八八。這次他們出醜出什麼樣，都顯而易見。
但小弟還要鼓勵各位繼續投票，現時戰況約175票支持：183票反對，書生借Twitter拉中國用戶的票，用到人海戰術也很明顯。
Short URL: http://wp.me/p7cGY-20q
MO's notebook 3 to 4 
看來罷免案也不獲通過了
畢竟, 拼人數, 也不能跟那邊的人比
如果中共下台，書生還會不會河蟹維基百科，仍是疑問。
不過，中共下台後，可能有人會告書生，也可能有人會申請禁制令，禁止書生參與維基百科的編輯和管理。
175:204… GAME OVER
175 vs 204
輸了
下次再戰
我沒有用維基百科的經驗. 但我聽一位教授鼓勵學生把研究習作放上維基百科. 一來要沒有抄襲, 二來給其他專家糾正錯誤. 是非常好的一個平台.
但為什麼到中文維基百科會有這樣的爭吵?
難道同樣的維基百科用了不同的準則?
如果反對罷免者真係「五毛」反而重好，可惜未必係。
有心慈手軟嘅，有崇拜「秩序」嘅，有搞大佬文化嘅，有自命「理性」政治潔癖嘅，更加唔少得可能存在嘅「真五毛」。一大班人，各有取向，可能多數重係真心「為 X 好」／「膠」，無咩重心可言，要對抗可以話係無處著力。
同意Perennial_Loser，正如香港有一大堆所謂溫和，自以為中立理智，認為民主就係搞事激進既人。對佢地，真係無符。
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Shizhao
看看這傢伙在英文 wikipedia 的 user page 才真好笑，在中文維基這麼多膠人認同一個只懂刪文回退的管理員，結果這傢伙去到英文維基俾人笑佢連基本規則都唔識。
維基百科已經可以媲美百度百科了。好，Google 退出中國，我看是時候維基進軍中國了。
時昭先生：
當中文維基百科不重開本人戶口時，本人亦不會讓閣下在本博客作任何留言。
這世界，你對別人幹過什麼，別人亦有權同樣對待你，你不懂反省確實令人遺憾。
Please keep an eye on Huaiwei, SchmuckyTheCat and Alanmak on the English version of Wikipedia too.
Image removal
I don’t get it, why are you removing images from a whole bunch of articles? Dragons flight 20:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Removal of images
Can you tell me why you are removing images from articles? You left no reasoning on the dicussion page why you removed the images, nor did you give any advance warning of your action.
All of the images that you removed from Dodge Dart were posted under the “Promotional" tag and used in a fair manner under those tags. I have replaced the images that you removed.
If you continue to do this I will involve an Admin in this manner. Stude62 13:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
A notation on your edits state that you removed the images from Commons. Can I ask that in the future that you use the comment line at the time you act. It helps us to understand why the images are being deleted. Stude62 13:43, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
You’ve reverted an EU sourced image of Chris Patten to a US government sourced, poorer image with no reason given whilst presumably migrating it to the commons. Going backwards doesn’t help wikipedia.–Sully 18:30, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you ! It is very nice of you to take the time to remove the broken links here at en:. Much appreciated! Jkelly 19:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding your IFD noms
When you are nominating images for deletion, please follow guidelines and notify the uploader appropriately. If the procedure is not followed, the images that were nominated cannot be deleted, even if there is a valid reason for it. Can I have your buy-in on this, as this would help all of us build and maintain Wikipedia? Thank you. — Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 03:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
被恥笑的時昭… 到了英文也做同樣的蠢事